![]() It is also apparent from the Disposition that the decision was upheld by Red Rock Casino, as it reads, “payment awarded.” Background 12 hearing, Chan Lengsavath, had submitted a recommendation that Station pay out the disputed jackpot, and that was the decision that the three-member NGCB affirmed. Without additional details to go on at this time, it would appear from the Disposition provided by the NGCB that the agent of the Dec. ![]() ![]() Avinoam Shamir, the following ruling was provided: “Hearing Examiner Recommends: Agent’s decision awarding payment of $62,126 to Avinoam Shamir be affirmed.”įrom the official Disposition (minutes) of the meeting, the recommendation is followed by, “GCB Disposition: Payment awarded, per GCB order.” From the Agenda of the meeting provided on the NGCB website, in the case Red Rock Casino Resort Spa v. Many will recall the July 7th controversy at Red Rock Casino in Las Vegas where Avi Shamir was denied the big share of a more than $120,000 Bad Beat Jackpot after his straight flush was beat, because the player with the winning straight flush, Leonard Schreter, exposed his cards before action on the river was complete.Īfter repeated delays on a decision, the Nevada Gaming Control Board (NGCB) ruled on the case at their Feb. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |